What a day...
Change the look and feel of Windows XP, Windows Vista with WindowBlinds
Published on June 27, 2007 By Alexandra In WinCustomize News

Stardock has released WindowBlinds 5.51 which adds 64-bit support for Windows Vista.  WindowBlinds is a program that can change the entire look and feel of Windows XP or Windows Vista by applying a new "skin" to the Windows user interface.  These skins (also known as visual styles) can change title bars, push buttons, the Start bar, scrollbars, and nearly every other part of the Windows interface.  Thousands of free skins are available to give Windows a whole new theme.

WindowBlinds 5.51 not only adds support for running on 64-bit Windows Vista (32-bit support already available) but also adds support for Vista Aero shadows even on skins that don't explicitly support shadows. WindowBlinds is a free download. Users can register it for $19.95 on its own or purchase it as part of Object Desktop for $49.95 which includes over a dozen additional programs to enhance the Windows experience.

The WindowBlinds home page is http://www.windowblinds.net.  Stardock's home page is https://www.stardock.com

        


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Jun 27, 2007
When will we see blurring in the XP version of WB? Also, is that something that's gonna have to be specifically used by a skin or is that gonna be an option we can apply to any skin ourselves, i.e. through options or something?
on Jun 27, 2007
Can someone post a more complete changelog? Anything else besides 64bit support?
on Jun 27, 2007
whiterabbit007: You may want to read this https://forums.wincustomize.com/?forumid=153&aid=152743
on Jun 27, 2007

When will we see blurring in the XP version of WB? Also, is that something that's gonna have to be specifically used by a skin or is that gonna be an option we can apply to any skin ourselves, i.e. through options or something?

That's WindowBlinds 6.

on Jun 27, 2007
Major Geeks say thats version 5.551 Build 97. Thats newer then I have. And I have OD!
on Jun 27, 2007
dwax: If you look on the System Information page in Wbconfig, you should see that you have build 97 (XP) or build 110 (Vista)
on Jun 27, 2007
With WindowBlinds installed the system takes a noticeably longer time to log on.

I'd like to see what the shadows would look like on a skin that already has them.
on Jun 27, 2007
Good job!

bored of the vista aero look...   
on Jun 27, 2007
I wouldn't get all happy just yet. Last time I tried Windowblinds for Vista (x64) a few days ago... it has a nice bug that makes your system tray icons double the size.... very interestly odd bug if you ask me.
on Jun 27, 2007
I wouldn't get all happy just yet. Last time I tried Windowblinds for Vista (x64) a few days ago... it has a nice bug that makes your system tray icons double the size.... very interestly odd bug if you ask me.


It doesn't seem that anyone else is having this problem.. Maybe if you asked for help you would get some.
on Jun 27, 2007
If a skin sets a very large titlebar height, your system tray icons will also resize.  This is true on XP and 64 bit Vista (though not 32 bit Vista)
on Jun 27, 2007

I wouldn't get all happy just yet. Last time I tried Windowblinds for Vista (x64) a few days ago... it has a nice bug that makes your system tray icons double the size.... very interestly odd bug if you ask me.


It does get annoying doesn't it.

I'd also like to figure out how to turn on these "new shadows". Any suggestions?
on Jun 27, 2007
It doesn't seem that anyone else is having this problem.. Maybe if you asked for help you would get some.

Get your eyes checked. https://forums.wincustomize.com/?aid=156135#1243016

If a skin sets a very large titlebar height, your system tray icons will also resize. This is true on XP and 64 bit Vista (though not 32 bit Vista)

Why on earth did you guys do that?!
on Jun 27, 2007
Why on earth did you guys do that?!


Yep that is what Neil did; he decided that when a skinner makes a skin with a large titlebar height he would make WindowBlinds break the system tray icons.


on Jun 28, 2007
Wait what? That wasn't directed twords HIM, more like me being angry at the fact that Stardock would willingly release WB with a bug they knew exsisted. As if they really didnt care about it.

If you guys knew of this "bug" why did you release wb with it? Not exactly a bright idea eh?
2 Pages1 2